William Sands
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position LM 62 · +n = growth to potential 69The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of William Sands in Career Mode
William Sands is a winger at New England Revolution, rated 63 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 69, LM. That's poor for their position. At 23 they already deliver and still rise (ceiling 69): the sweet spot between output and projection.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you play William Sands?
Their place is out wide as LM. They work by stretching the pitch and attacking the full-back one-on-one; the more isolated with their marker, the better. They can also play LB. The game also rewards them with roles like Wide midfielder and Winger, which reinforce that profile.
What are their strengths?
Their best assets are agility (74) and top speed (73). Their agility is run-of-the-mill and it's the trait to build their game around.
Where do they struggle?
Where they struggle: finishing (44) and curve (44). Pick their role to hide those gaps.
Are they worth the price?
Their market price sits around 810 K€, with 5 K€ in wages. A project signing: cheap for what they can become, so the margin is on your side. And with a contract until 2025, you have leverage to bring the price down.
How much will they grow?
They start from 63 with a ceiling of 69 — that's +6 of headroom. Still at an improving age; with regular minutes they'll add points season by season. Give them continuity and a good role so that potential doesn't stay on paper.
What is William Sands's best position?
Their best position is LM, though they can also play LB.
How high can William Sands's rating go?
Their potential is 69. They start from 63, so they can rise +6 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 810 K€, with 5 K€ wages.
Are they good at dribbling?
Their dribbling is 66 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on William Franklin Sands.