Thomas O'Connor
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position CB 63 · +n = growth to potential 67The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Thomas O'Connor in Career Mode
Thomas O'Connor is a centre-back at Wrexham, rated 63 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 67, CB. By the standards of the role, that's a bit short. At 25 it's immediate output: what you see is what you get, no waiting.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you play Thomas O'Connor?
Their place is the heart of the defence as CB. A pure centre-back: pair them with a quick one if they lack top speed, and use their aerial dominance at set pieces. They can also play CDM and CM. The game also rewards them with roles like Defender and Ball-playing defender, which reinforce that profile.
What are you buying?
Where they really hurt you is jumping (78) and strength (70). Their jumping is reliable and it's the trait to build their game around.
Where do they struggle?
It's not all good: composure (56) and slide tackling (58). Pick their role to hide those gaps.
Are they a good buy?
Worth around 648 K€ with 8 K€ wages. Not a bargain, but money well spent if you want a reliable starter from day one. And with a contract until 2027, you have leverage to bring the price down.
How far can they go?
They start from 63 with a ceiling of 67 — that's +4 of headroom. Some room left, but at their age improvement is slow now: don't expect a leap. Potential doesn't rise on its own: it needs games, not the bench.
What is Thomas O'Connor's best position?
Their best position is CB, though they can also play CDM and CM.
How high can Thomas O'Connor's rating go?
Their potential is 67. They start from 63, so they can rise +4 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 648 K€, with 8 K€ wages.
Do they defend the box well?
Their marking is 59 — weak for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Thomas James O'Connor.