Thomas Bloxham
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position ST 63 · +n = growth to potential 74The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Thomas Bloxham in Career Mode
Thomas Bloxham is a wide player at Blackpool FC, rated 64 overall in FC 26 with a potential of 74, RM. By the standards of the role, that's a bit short. At 21 with 10 points of headroom up to 74, they're one of the most serious bets on the future you can sign.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2025
What role should Thomas Bloxham have?
Their place is out wide as RM. They work by stretching the pitch and attacking the full-back one-on-one; the more isolated with their marker, the better. They can also play ST and RW. The game also rewards them with roles like Winger and Inside forward, which reinforce that profile.
What are their strengths?
Their best assets are top speed (80) and acceleration (74). Their top speed is notable and it's the trait to build their game around.
Do they have weaknesses?
Where they struggle: curve (36) and crossing (58). Pick their role to hide those gaps.
Are they worth signing in Career Mode?
Their market price sits around 1,5 M€, with 1 K€ in wages. A project signing: cheap for what they can become, so the margin is on your side.
How much will they grow?
They start from 64 with a ceiling of 74 — that's +10 of headroom. Still at an improving age; with regular minutes they'll add points season by season. Potential doesn't rise on its own: it needs games, not the bench.
What is Thomas Bloxham's best position?
Their best position is RM, though they can also play ST and RW.
How high can Thomas Bloxham's rating go?
Their potential is 74. They start from 64, so they can rise +10 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 1,5 M€, with 1 K€ wages.
Are they good at dribbling?
Their dribbling is 66 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Thomas Stanley Bloxham.