Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position LW 57 · +n = growth to potential 61The six face stats at a glance.
How to get the best out of Scott McGill in Career Mode
Scott McGill is a midfielder at Dundalk, rated 56 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 61, CM. That's weak for their position. At 22 they still have 5 points to grow up to 61, so they add to the XI and gain value.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you get the best out of Scott McGill?
Their place is in central midfield as CM. They're the engine of midfield: circulate the ball, start moves and connect defence to attack. Surround them with legs that run for them. They can also play CDM. The game also rewards them with roles like Box-to-Box, which reinforce that profile.
What do they do well?
Their weapons: ball control (62) and short passing (58). That a bit short ball control is their signature.
What are they missing?
Their weak points: long passing (51) and stamina (51). Nothing the right system and teammates can't cover.
Are they a good buy?
Their market price sits around 238 K€, with 3 K€ in wages. As an investment they're among the best: give them minutes, they gain value and you end up making money on them. They're also out of contract soon (2025), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
How much will they grow?
They start from 56 with a ceiling of 61 — that's +5 of headroom. Still at an improving age; with regular minutes they'll add points season by season. Give them continuity and a good role so that potential doesn't stay on paper.
What is Scott McGill's best position?
Their best position is CM, though they can also play CDM.
How high can Scott McGill's rating go?
Their potential is 61. They start from 56, so they can rise +5 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 238 K€, with 3 K€ wages.
Are they reliable on the ball?
Their short passing is 58 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Scott McGill.