Samuel Surridge
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position ST 71 · +n = growth to potential 74The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Samuel Surridge in Career Mode
Samuel Surridge is a forward at Nashville SC, rated 71 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 74, ST. By the standards of the role, that's run-of-the-mill. In full maturity (25); sign them to win now, not for the future.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you play Samuel Surridge?
Their place is up front as ST. Not one for running the channels: use them as a penalty-box reference to pin centre-backs, hold up play and finish inside. The game also rewards them with roles like Target forward, which reinforce that profile.
What are their strengths?
Where they really hurt you is finishing (75) and off-the-ball movement (74). Their finishing is competent and it's the trait to build their game around.
What are they missing?
It's not all good: acceleration (60). Nothing the right system and teammates can't cover.
Are they worth the price?
Worth around 2,7 M€ with 9 K€ wages. You pay for immediate, proven output: pricey but no surprises, they deliver now. And with a contract until 2026, you have leverage to bring the price down.
How far can they go?
They start from 71 with a ceiling of 74 — that's +3 of headroom. Some room left, but at their age improvement is slow now: don't expect a leap. Potential doesn't rise on its own: it needs games, not the bench.
What is Samuel Surridge's best position?
Their best position is ST.
How high can Samuel Surridge's rating go?
Their potential is 74. They start from 71, so they can rise +3 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 2,7 M€, with 9 K€ wages.
Do they finish well?
Their finishing is 75 — reliable for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Samuel William Surridge.