FC 2720 Aug 2026▾
Murat Akpınar
24 Jan 1999 · Shirt 11 · Erzurumspor FK since FC 27
Attributes
34 statsPace
71Shooting
57Passing
64Dribbling
68Defending
62Physical
48Rating by position
Best position CAM 64 · EA’s official formula from the attributes · +n = growth to potential
Official EA formula from the attributes. Cyan border: natural positions.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, potential and value in every EA FC. Swipe if there are more.
-
20 Aug 2026Debut · FC 27
First appearance in the data
How to get the best out of Murat Akpınar in Career Mode
Murat Akpınar is a midfielder at Erzurumspor FK, rated 63 overall in FC 27 with a potential of 65, CM. By the standards of the role, that's weak. At 27 they're at their peak and deliver from matchday one.
By FAFIFA Team · updated August 2026
How do you get the best out of Murat Akpınar?
Their place is in central midfield as CM. They're the engine of midfield: circulate the ball, start moves and connect defence to attack. Surround them with legs that run for them. They can also play CAM. The game also rewards them with roles like Playmaker, which reinforce that profile.
What are you buying?
What makes them reliable: vision (67) and short passing (65). That a bit short vision is their signature.
Where do they struggle?
Their soft spots: stamina (58). Pick their role to hide those gaps.
Are they worth signing in Career Mode?
Worth around 656 K€ with 5 K€ wages. You pay for immediate, proven output: pricey but no surprises, they deliver now. They're also out of contract soon (2027), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
What is Murat Akpınar's best position?
Their best position is CM, though they can also play CAM.
How high can Murat Akpınar's rating go?
Their potential is 65. They start from 63, so they can rise +2 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 656 K€, with 5 K€ wages.
Are they reliable on the ball?
Their short passing is 65 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Murat Cem Akpınar.