M. Lund
2025 · clause 284 K€
Weak foot ★★★★★ · Skill moves ★★★★★
International ★★★★★
How to get the best out of M. Lund in Career Mode
M. Lund is an all-rounder at Salford City (60 overall, CM) — a bit short at that. At 33 they're in the final stretch; use them for what they still give, not for what they were.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you play M. Lund?
Their place is in central midfield as CM. Put them in charge of the tempo; they shine passing and organising more than arriving in the box. They can also play CDM. The game also rewards them with roles like Box-to-Box and Holding, which reinforce that profile.
What are you buying?
What makes them reliable: stamina (64) and composure (63). That weak stamina is their signature.
Where do they struggle?
Their soft spots: reading of the game (58) and long passing (60). Nothing the right system and teammates can't cover.
Are they worth signing in Career Mode?
Worth around 162 K€ with 12 K€ wages. At their age their value only drops: negotiate and don't tie a long contract. They're also out of contract soon (2025), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
What is M. Lund's best position?
Their best position is CM, though they can also play CDM.
How high can M. Lund's rating go?
They're already at their ceiling (60): at their age the rating won't rise.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 162 K€, with 12 K€ wages.
Are they reliable on the ball?
Their short passing is 62 — poor for their position.
Career Mode performance
Real average reached by the community · coming soon, once careers are loggedAttributes · 34 stats
Pace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
By pitch position
Computed with sofifa’s official position formula over the individual attributes. The +n is the growth up to potential.
Specialities and traits
No specialities or traits recorded for this player.
Similar players
Similar profiles by position and averages
Be the first to comment on Matthew Charles Lund.