Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position CB 63 · +n = growth to potential 72The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Mark Natta in Career Mode
Mark Natta is a centre-back at Newcastle Jets, rated 63 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 72, CB. By the standards of the role, that's poor. At 21 they're aiming at 72. A project, not an instant fix, but the kind worth the wait.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
How do you get the best out of Mark Natta?
Their place is the heart of the defence as CB. A pure centre-back: pair them with a quick one if they lack top speed, and use their aerial dominance at set pieces. The game also rewards them with roles like Defender and Ball-playing defender, which reinforce that profile.
What do they do well?
Their best assets are strength (79) and jumping (78). That good strength is their signature.
Where do they struggle?
Where they struggle: composure (57) and aerial ability (58). Things to keep in mind when building the team around them.
Are they a good buy?
Their market price sits around 1,1 M€, with 2 K€ in wages. As an investment they're among the best: give them minutes, they gain value and you end up making money on them. They're also out of contract soon (2026), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
How much will they grow?
They start from 63 with a ceiling of 72 — that's +9 of headroom. Still at an improving age; with regular minutes they'll add points season by season. Potential doesn't rise on its own: it needs games, not the bench.
What is Mark Natta's best position?
Their best position is CB.
How high can Mark Natta's rating go?
Their potential is 72. They start from 63, so they can rise +9 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 1,1 M€, with 2 K€ wages.
Do they defend the box well?
Their marking is 62 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Mark Natta.