Kim Kang San
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position CB 62 · +n = growth to potential 67The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Kim Kang San in Career Mode
Kim Kang San is a central defender at Gimcheon Sangmu FC, rated 62 overall in FC 25 with a potential of 67, CB. By the standards of the role, that's a bit short. At 25 they're at their peak and deliver from matchday one.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
What role should Kim Kang San have?
Their place is the heart of the defence as CB. Put them in charge of the back line; they defend the box and set pieces better than chasing in open space. They can also play RB. The game also rewards them with roles like Defender and Stopper, which reinforce that profile.
What are you buying?
Their best assets are strength (74) and jumping (71). That decent strength is their signature.
Do they have weaknesses?
Where they struggle: composure (42) and aerial ability (56). Nothing the right system and teammates can't cover.
Are they worth the price?
Their market price sits around 567 K€, with 5 K€ in wages. You pay for immediate, proven output: pricey but no surprises, they deliver now. They're also out of contract soon (2025), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
How much will they grow?
They start from 62 with a ceiling of 67 — that's +5 of headroom. Some room left, but at their age improvement is slow now: don't expect a leap. Potential doesn't rise on its own: it needs games, not the bench.
What is Kim Kang San's best position?
Their best position is CB, though they can also play RB.
How high can Kim Kang San's rating go?
Their potential is 67. They start from 62, so they can rise +5 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 567 K€, with 5 K€ wages.
Do they defend the box well?
Their marking is 65 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Kang-san Kim.