Filippo Sgarbi
Attributes
34 statsPace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
Rating by position
Best position CB 65 · +n = growth to potential 68The six face stats at a glance.
Edition by edition
Launch rating, age and potential in every EA FC / FIFA since FC 25
FC 25
How to get the best out of Filippo Sgarbi in Career Mode
Filippo Sgarbi is a central defender at Calcio Padova, rated 65 overall in FC 26 with a potential of 68, CB. That's weak for their position. At 27 it's immediate output: what you see is what you get, no waiting. Above all they stand out for their strength (83).
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2025
How do you get the best out of Filippo Sgarbi?
Their place is the heart of the defence as CB. Put them in charge of the back line; they defend the box and set pieces better than chasing in open space. The game also rewards them with roles like Stopper and Defender, which reinforce that profile.
What are you buying?
Where they really hurt you is strength (83) and jumping (75). Their strength is notable and it's the trait to build their game around.
Do they have weaknesses?
It's not all good: composure (60), reading of the game (62) and top speed (61). Pick their role to hide those gaps.
Are they worth the price?
Worth around 944 K€ with 1 K€ wages. You pay for immediate, proven output: pricey but no surprises, they deliver now. And with a contract until 2027, you have leverage to bring the price down.
How far can they go?
They start from 65 with a ceiling of 68 — that's +3 of headroom. Some room left, but at their age improvement is slow now: don't expect a leap. Give them continuity and a good role so that potential doesn't stay on paper.
What is Filippo Sgarbi's best position?
Their best position is CB.
How high can Filippo Sgarbi's rating go?
Their potential is 68. They start from 65, so they can rise +3 with minutes and development.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 944 K€, with 1 K€ wages.
Do they defend the box well?
Their marking is 64 — poor for their position.
Comments
0Be the first to comment on Filippo Lorenzo Sgarbi.