C. Stokes
2025 · clause 227 K€
Weak foot ★★★★★ · Skill moves ★★★★★
International ★★★★★
How to get the best out of C. Stokes in Career Mode
C. Stokes is a central defender at Barrow (60 overall, CB) — poor at that. At 33 they're in the final stretch; use them for what they still give, not for what they were.
By FAFIFA Team · updated September 2024
What role should C. Stokes have?
Their place is the heart of the defence as CB. A pure centre-back: pair them with a quick one if they lack top speed, and use their aerial dominance at set pieces. The game also rewards them with roles like Defender and Ball-playing defender, which reinforce that profile.
What are their strengths?
Where they really hurt you is strength (75) and jumping (62). That reliable strength is their signature.
Do they have weaknesses?
It's not all good: reading of the game (58), composure (58) and top speed (49). Things to keep in mind when building the team around them.
Are they a good buy?
Worth around 130 K€ with 10 K€ wages. At their age their value only drops: negotiate and don't tie a long contract. They're also out of contract soon (2025), so you can push in talks or grab them almost free at the end of the season.
What is C. Stokes's best position?
Their best position is CB.
How high can C. Stokes's rating go?
They're already at their ceiling (60): at their age the rating won't rise.
Are they expensive to sign?
Their market value is around 130 K€, with 10 K€ wages.
Do they defend the box well?
Their marking is 60 — weak for their position.
Career Mode performance
Real average reached by the community · coming soon, once careers are loggedAttributes · 34 stats
Pace
Shooting
Passing
Dribbling
Defending
Physical
Attacking
Skill
Movement
Power
Mentality
Defending
By pitch position
Computed with sofifa’s official position formula over the individual attributes. The +n is the growth up to potential.
Specialities and traits
No specialities or traits recorded for this player.
Similar players
Similar profiles by position and averages
Be the first to comment on Christopher Martin Thomas Stokes.