Best position for T. Anselm
62Overall
Overall of T. Anselm in every position. In his own position it is EA’s real rating; the rest are estimated from the individual attributes with a per-position weight vector calibrated over 13785 players, anchored to that real value.
Reconversion: T. Anselm would rate higher at LM (64) than at LW (63) — +1.
Natural position
LW63
Best estimated
LM64
Rating in every position
LM
+2 → 66 64
LW
natural
63
CAM
+2 → 65 63
ST
natural
+2 → 64 62
CM
+2 → 61 59
LB
+2 → 56 54
CDM
+2 → 53 51
CB
+2 → 50 48
Method: the rating in the player’s own position is EA’s real value (exact). For every other position we apply, on top of that anchor, each position’s weights — derived by linear regression (OLS) over our ~18k players, so they self-calibrate every edition.