Best position for M. Antonucci
68Overall
Overall of M. Antonucci in every position. In his own position it is EA’s real rating; the rest are estimated from the individual attributes with a per-position weight vector calibrated over 13785 players, anchored to that real value.
Reconversion: M. Antonucci would rate higher at LM (71) than at CAM (69) — +2.
Natural position
CAM69
Best estimated
LM71
Rating in every position
LM
71
LW
71
CAM
natural
69
ST
natural
+1 → 69 68
CM
+2 → 66 64
LB
+2 → 59 57
CDM
+2 → 57 55
CB
+2 → 51 49
Method: the rating in the player’s own position is EA’s real value (exact). For every other position we apply, on top of that anchor, each position’s weights — derived by linear regression (OLS) over our ~18k players, so they self-calibrate every edition.