Best position for M. Agger
64Overall
Overall of M. Agger in every position. In his own position it is EA’s real rating; the rest are estimated from the individual attributes with a per-position weight vector calibrated over 13785 players, anchored to that real value.
M. Agger performs best in a natural position (ST). No reconversion gains it.
Natural position
ST65
Best estimated
ST65
Rating in every position
ST
natural
+2 → 67 65
LM
natural
+2 → 66 64
LW
natural
64
CAM
+2 → 64 62
CM
+2 → 57 55
LB
+2 → 47 45
CDM
+2 → 44 42
CB
+2 → 38 36
Method: the rating in the player’s own position is EA’s real value (exact). For every other position we apply, on top of that anchor, each position’s weights — derived by linear regression (OLS) over our ~18k players, so they self-calibrate every edition.