Best position for L. Marsh
60Overall
Overall of L. Marsh in every position. In his own position it is EA’s real rating; the rest are estimated from the individual attributes with a per-position weight vector calibrated over 13785 players, anchored to that real value.
Reconversion: L. Marsh would rate higher at LW (61) than at ST (60) — +1.
Natural position
ST60
Best estimated
LW61
Rating in every position
LW
61
ST
natural
+2 → 62 60
LM
+2 → 62 60
CAM
natural
+2 → 61 59
CM
natural
+2 → 56 54
LB
+2 → 54 52
CDM
+2 → 51 49
CB
+2 → 49 47
Method: the rating in the player’s own position is EA’s real value (exact). For every other position we apply, on top of that anchor, each position’s weights — derived by linear regression (OLS) over our ~18k players, so they self-calibrate every edition.