Best position for C. Hollman
60Overall
Overall of C. Hollman in every position. In his own position it is EA’s real rating; the rest are estimated from the individual attributes with a per-position weight vector calibrated over 13785 players, anchored to that real value.
Reconversion: C. Hollman would rate higher at LM (62) than at CM (61) — +1.
Natural position
CM61
Best estimated
LM62
Rating in every position
LM
+2 → 64 62
CM
natural
+2 → 63 61
CAM
+2 → 63 61
CDM
natural
+2 → 62 60
LB
+2 → 62 60
LW
59
ST
+2 → 58 56
CB
+2 → 57 55
Method: the rating in the player’s own position is EA’s real value (exact). For every other position we apply, on top of that anchor, each position’s weights — derived by linear regression (OLS) over our ~18k players, so they self-calibrate every edition.